Skip to content

removed port forcing#1

Open
danil-nizamov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove_port_forcing
Open

removed port forcing#1
danil-nizamov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove_port_forcing

Conversation

@danil-nizamov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Removed the port forcing, so we can run this activity in split screen

@danil-nizamov danil-nizamov requested a review from diegochine May 23, 2026 00:34
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 23, 2026

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 85cb3535-fe2d-4f54-aa68-aebda9800aef

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45e9454 and 64522ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server.js

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the server's port selection logic in server.js to respect the PORT environment variable unconditionally. Previously, production mode forced the port to 3000 regardless of any PORT environment variable setting. The updated logic applies Number(process.env.PORT) || 3000 uniformly across all execution modes, defaulting to port 3000 only when the environment variable is not set.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: removing port forcing logic from the server configuration.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining why the port forcing was removed to enable split screen functionality.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

ESLint skipped: no ESLint configuration detected in root package.json. To enable, add eslint to devDependencies.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant